Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard Pearce's avatar

The problem is that all these bets are based on the assumption that gasoline is ONLY going to become somewhat more expensive in the next 10 years.

But in the next 5, even the US is going to be facing so many climate disasters that there's going to be a concerted move to ELIMINATE fossil fuels from the public and the insurance industry and the farm lobby and others.

And remember the Obama 'buyback' that had people trading in their old vehicles? That's likely to come back, except the new vehicles will have to be EVs.

The luxury IC cars are headed the way of the elite horses at best, and could become the stolen Rembrandts (yes, you own one and display it to others with similar pieces for reputation games, but that's about it, you don't try and block legislation making it illegal to buy one)

Julius Müller's avatar

There is no structural reason as to why Porsche should not be able to compete against Chinese EVs. It's way too simplistic to assume that premium EVs are all about self driving and software while Porsche was all about sound (?) and the combustion engine.

Porsche has always been about pleasure of driving and handling a racy car on public roads.

The simple fact is that they were unable to transmit that with the Taycan. That car had an over engineered but under delivering battery and they didn't get the balance right in a way that this car could feel like a Porsche.

They should have waited, as Ferrari did, to spend more time to understand the unique performance curve of eDrives and batteries before launching electric models.

Now they will muddle through in some stuck in the middle strategy between powertrains, price points, and brand positioning. Shame, really

No posts

Ready for more?